Divorce Law

2008AbstractNegative financial consequences of divorce have been documented however , pick strategies for dissolving marital economic partnerships have not been compared or empirically explored . Minnesota 1999 unfeigned court s (n 414 ) and fivesome alternative strategies were evaluated and compared for the degree to which each strategy produced equitable income distributions and enough levels of keep for male and egg-producing(prenominal)-headed households . The distributive justice theory was use by applying the principles of equity , needs , and contributions , to the financial outcomes determined by the various strategiesThe research design was a repeated measures MANOVA , having within subjects factors of strategy for allocating income , and household /gender and between subjects factors of pre-divorce gross income level , and length of marriage . Males had higher income-to-needs ratios than females with each strategy and the income sharing formula .

Minnesota s actual court s and the income sharing formula produced the most discrepant male and female income-to-needs ratios and the actual court also resulted in the highest percentage of females living at and below the poverty level . Results suggested concern for pincer welfare because the majority of females in this sample were custodiansImplications suggested that a miscellany is needed in the practices of allocating incomes , if the distributive justice principles of equity needs , and contributions are values that should be realized . Singer and the premarital Security Agreement formulas produced the most equitable income-to needs ratios , compared to the actual court , when considering the equity principle and the fewest households below...If you want to decease a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .