Evaluate The Self-control Theory Of Crime

Running head : SELF-CONTROL THEORY OF CRIMESelf-Control Theory of Crime[Author s Name][Tutor s Name][Class]AbstractOne of the biggest criticisms of the temperance offensive scheme is that it puts excessive load of crime obligation onto parents (especially undivided parents , and cliffs the role of objective attributes (race gender , social conditions ) in motivating crime . However , it seems that such criticisms lack objectiveness , although they deserve attention and are reasonably groundedSelf-Control Theory of CrimeIntroductionThe sobriety crime hypothesis is oft viewed as the core of putting excessive responsibility on parents for the crimes of their children However , these criticisms are often exaggerated low self-control theory cannot serve a single justification for the delinquency problems . Recent statistics will switch off the relevance of other important factors in crime and delinquencyClassical theories of crime are concentrated on various attributes of criminals , and view these attributes as the causes of crime and delinquency . Classic theory explains crime in terms of social location , social bonds , or subculture social status and emphasizes the deterrents for crime as the major determinant (Gottfredson Hirschi 1990 . The self-control theory of crime initially views criminal behavior from a dissimilar perspective . Social factors are pushed to the background , while the midland personality motives to commit crimes become crucial . In to come across whether the discussed criticism is relevant in terms of self-control theory , it will be useful to view the theory by dint of the prism of its separate elementsFirst , the self-control theory of crime is immediately linked to the human inability to delay gratification (Belliston , 2004 . This gist , that people with low self-control are characterized by the swear to guide everything here and now , and these desires motivate the person at committing the crime . In this aspect , it is easy to criticize parents (especially , single parents ) in that they are not capable of bringing up their children in accordance with the social standards . However , this criticism becomes opposed when the statistics is analyzed .

The assumption that single parents solely contribute into the emergence of the low self-control is wrong . On the contrary , studies have shown repeatedly a consistent relationship between teen delinquency and large family size , marital disharmony , inebriant abuse in parents and overall social deprivation (Belliston , 2004 . The bout of delinquency acts in New York has decreased for an eighth since 1999 (Higgins , 2006 , and this decrease is not caused by the constant decrease of single families , as one could expect . These tendencies and the motives of juvenile crimes and delinquency do not upon family relations , but are also linked to orthogonal social conditions , in which delinquent criminals existSecond , crime is a position which represents easy or simple desire gratification (Gottfredson Hirschi , 1990 . This means that the reasons of crime and delinquency lay much deeper , than critics assume The garishness of juvenile crimes directly depends on the social scotch , and cultural factors . Numerous researches have shown that the number of juvenile crimes increase during the periods of economic declines and social instability (Belliston , 2004 Gottfredson Hirschi...If you want to get a ripe essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .