Case Study

Part A . Ella Williams fixed on the assembly line at Toyota repel Manufacturing plant in Kentucky . She developed pain in her detention wrists , and arms and was diagnosed with impairments including wrist bone tunnel syndrome . Ms . Williams was reassigned to ii quality control inspection jobs , However , when Toyota Motor Manufacturing added a third such quality control job , on that point was a dispute as to what happened next According to Ms . Williams her condition worsened and the company refused a request by her for an accommodation , but according to Toyota Motor Manufacturing the actor evidently began missing work on a regular stand Eventually , Ms . Williams received a letter from Toyota Motor Manufacturing that terminated her employment and cited an allegedly poor attendance degrade . Ms . Williams d a charge of dis cleverness contrast with the EEOC . After receiving a right to sue letter Ms . Williams d suit against Toyota Motor Manufacturing for having violated the adenosine deaminase and establish her view that she had a disability , for purposes of the ADA , on some(prenominal) assertions , including one that her impairments substantially especial(a) her in the major action activity of playing manual tasksClaiming to be disabled from performing her automobile assembly line job by carpal tunnel syndrome and related impairments , responder sued petitioner , her former employer , for helplessness to provide her with a reasonable accommodation as inevitable by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA . The District Court granted petitioner summary judgment , holding that respondent s impairment did non qualify as a disability under the ADA because it had not substantially limited any major feel activity , and that there was no evidence that respondent had had a record of a substantially limiting impairment or that petitioner had regarded her as having such an impairment . The Sixth traffic circle reversed , finding that the impairments substantially limited respondent in the major life activity of performing manual tasks .

In to demonstrate that she was so limited , said the motor inn , respondent had to show that her manual disability involved a relegate of manual activities affecting the ability to perform tasks at work . Respondent satisfied this test , according to the court , because her ailments prevented her from doing the tasks associated with trusted types of manual jobs that require the gripping of tools and repetitive work with hands and arms extended at or above raise levels for extended periods of time . In reaching this conclusion , the court found that evidence that respondent could tend to her personal hygiene and carry out personal or household chores did not affect a determination that her impairments substantially limited her ability to perform the range of manual tasks associated with assembly line jobPart B . The District Court found that Ella Williams did not have a disability , as defined by the ADA , at the time that the company allegedly refused to accommodate her , and while the worker had a physical impairment , her asserting that she was substantially limited in performing manual tasks was irretrievably contradicted by her pressure sensation that she could perform some assembly and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .