Business Law

NameUniversityCourseTutorDateBUSINESS LAWBy their nature promissory flavors are written promises by oneness party requiring the payment of a sum of gold to the toter of the note . In this case George is the marker of the note get out I am the payee . The promissory note is not go out implying that its payable stringently aft(prenominal) six month after presentation for payment . heretofore , in business police force clarity of terms and conditions regarding the transfers and payments on negotiable peckers is very authoritative . Unless the payee named to be the `bearer then strictness should be followed in making any payment in line with these instrumentsFor George , he all initiated the promissory note . The basics of business jurisprudence states that any symbol which is placed on a note to authenticate its payment equals making full name piece . Therefore for George , he had fully authenticated the payment of his promissory note However , with the possession of the note I offernot asseverate for the payment because the note is conditioned to its payments , that 500 will be paid on the sale of George s automobile . With these conditions , the note would simply be payable after the automobile had been sold . George flock use the reinforcement of the law to claim that , the payment to the promissory note was to be made after the sale of the automobile . However George as the maker can claim that the aspiration for the payment of the note was subject to a contract that would only have occurred after the sale of the car (Collier , 2001 ,. 65A check is essentially a draft drawn and payable on claim by a bank in this case , the devil checks that lacked endorsement authority in form of a composition , were viable for endorsement and payment . Since the stamp on its feel was equivalent to the initials of the drawer . These checks were supposed to be paid .

In the basic understanding of business law signing an instrument is equaled to any initial of whatever nature , be it a seal stamp or even thumb gull . Therefore to the knowledge of the company , the stamp could still take on behalf of the cashier s signature . However , the company can demand payment by the bank to its account on the three checks that were lost and collected by one of its workers . However this could only be done if the payment on them was strictly to a named person (payee . In the event of the checks been payable to a bearer , the employee in their possession could claim on the asperity of their possession and actually the right payee (Smith , 2002 br.102Since the voucher had a money value in it , it was negotiable by the fact that , C would use it to perform a transaction . However , at one point Belmont may not be presumable for the fraud in C s voucher . It may patronage itself under the image of C s negligence . Arguing that , C was negligent to the...If you want to get a full essay, fellowship it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .