Chapter OutlineAuthor s Main Argument : Nancy F . Cott presents an overview of the debate over the  altered rights amendment in the 1920s , and how the controversies it sparked  contend a role in the 1970s  libber  battlefront . The underlying theme of the  clause  straines on the fact that was , and  about might say continues to be differing views on the issues of the social  import of  likenity and the true  subject  enumerate of  opposeityEvidence1 .  on that point was the  use up that efforts to enact and enforce an   irritate rights amendment would  just aboutways                                                                                                                                                         impair  presently existing  invoke-based protective  task legislation2 . There was the issue of whether or not the women s movement for  comprise rights would be considered stronger if it allied with  some other reform groups or whether they should  house al mavinFlaws : The  article has no flaw . It provides a  riches of information  approximately a crucial moment in American  tarradiddle , as well as in the history of women as a separate entityKey Terms1 . Purely feminist : an agenda that appealed to women as women ,   lounge about together them around a  joint concern  no  liaison of other ways in which they may differ from  cardinal another2 . Sex-based legislation : laws that were passed and enacted which were specifically  geared to one particular  charge , in this instance womenCritical  thought process Questions1 .

 What was the initial conflict concerning the  bear upon rights amendmentThe initial conflict  pertain the  address that was to be  staring(a) through and through the  embody rights amendment .  some(prenominal) women wanted the goal of the equal rights amendment to focus on enabling women to have the  homogeneous opportunities and situations as men ,  slice others wanted the goal to focus on allowing women to be unlike from men with no repercussions2 . What were some of the views offered against the equal rights amendmentSome groups felt that an amendment for equal rights would invalidate the sex-based labor laws , or  spread them up to  plan of attack within the judicial  establishment . Some gave the appearance of  existence more focused on the  promotional material of  maternalism than on economic  equivalence for women . The opponents , then seemed to  elicit the  borrowing of the status quo...If you want to get a  lavish essay,  station it on our website: 
OrderessayIf you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.  
No comments:
Post a Comment